Re: Re: Thought on OIDs

I personally would like to see 8byte OIDs or at least int8 sequences, I'm
a little worried about the pain of managing a potential rollover when I'm
using sequences as a replication key between servers.

Alex.

On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Rod Taylor writes:
>
> > Someones bound to hit it in a year or 2 as Postgres is getting pretty
> > good for large projects as well as the small, especially with 7.1's
> > speed enhancements. Hopefully 7.2 will create cycling OIDs and XIDs.
> > Then less problems in 'unlimited' extendability.
>
> The easiest approach for OIDs will probably be making them optional in the
> first place. For the vast majority of users, the OIDs are just wasting
> space.
>
> The cycling XID idea is based on the assertion that eventually all
> transactions will be closed, at which time a record is either known
> committed or known dead so that the XID can be recycled. For OIDs, this
> is not practical. And if you wanted OIDs that automatically fill in the
> holes, that's probably not realistic.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>