| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] regression tests |
| Date: | 1999-11-17 13:33:37 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.9911171427070.18751-100000@Uggla.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Jan Wieck wrote:
> That should have been done BEFORE messing up anything. This
> hasn't been done, so I think it's the job of those who change
> output formats, to provide new expected regression results
> too. This hasn't been done too, and that's bad.
I explicitly informed everyone that this would happen a long time before I
finalized psql. Nobody seemed to care a lot. Now, weeks after the fact
some people start wondering that perhaps they want to run regression tests
once in a while. I'm not the regression test maintainer, nor do I have
knowledge of how to remake them, so all I can do is inform everyone and
cooperate on anything that's necessary. But silence is implicit approval.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 1999-11-17 15:07:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-11-17 12:48:39 | Re: [HACKERS] regression tests |