Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues
Date: 2000-06-13 13:00:44
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10006131458280.20240-100000@Ulv.DoCS.UU.SE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> IIRC, there was some unhappiness with the proposal you quote, so I'm
> not sure we've quite agreed what to do... but clearly something must
> be done.

You might want to look at SQL99, too. It contains a type system and has
something to say on these issues. At least I would hate to see something
flat-out incompatible drawn up.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergio A. Kessler 2000-06-13 13:00:47 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-13 12:57:27 Re: \h behaviour - strange ?