From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
---|---|
To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
Date: | 2000-02-29 16:38:26 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002291737320.18993-100000@Rama.DoCS.UU.SE |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> I vote for the SQL92 TEMPORARY. Let's not add a keyword that is non-standard
> just because one or another commercial database makes use of it, unless
> there's some real functionality to be gained that's not covered by the
> standard.
The difference is that TEMP is already a keyword since 6.5 and we're
considering removing it.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-02-29 16:39:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-29 16:37:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-29 17:19:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-29 16:09:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |