Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0
Date: 2000-02-24 13:04:52
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002241400260.17421-100000@Hummer.DoCS.UU.SE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Here is my list of 7.0 changes. Please let me know of any changes I
> should make to it.

> Allow ^C to cancel COPY command (Massimo)

That's cool, but if you look closely, psql doesn't do that (anymore). :(
Is it safe to send PQcancelRequest in a copy state and then just forget
about it? What's the correct behaviour? With everyone requesting longjmp's
at the last minute, I had to disable ^C during COPY.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-24 13:08:42 Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-24 12:51:40 Re: GNU make (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages)