Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change
Date: 2000-02-17 12:00:17
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002171258480.2933-100000@Oxe.DoCS.UU.SE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think it's too late in the 7.0 cycle to start thinking about renaming
> the numeric types.

I didn't mean that this should happen now or even soon. It was more of a
policy/practice inquiry.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sevo Stille 2000-02-17 12:07:59 Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-17 11:48:57 Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode