Re: [HACKERS] psql problem

From: Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql problem
Date: 2000-02-17 11:21:03
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002171218580.2933-100000@Oxe.DoCS.UU.SE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> No, I think Chris was complaining about the behavior with an
> incomplete query in the buffer. I can't show it with current
> sources since psql is exiting on ^C, but 6.5 works like this:
>
> play=> foobar
> play-> ^C
> CANCEL request sent
> <-- return typed here to get a prompt

Actually, I have an idea why that is, too. The signal handler should tell
readline that input is done. At the time you press return there, it's
still reading input.

> play-> select 2+2;
> ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "foobar"
> play=>

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-17 11:25:16 Re: [HACKERS] psql password prompt
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-17 11:17:09 Re: [HACKERS] psql problem