| From: | Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> |
|---|---|
| To: | Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris |
| Date: | 2000-01-20 11:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001201218150.15489-100000@Puma.DoCS.UU.SE |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Keith Parks wrote:
> Just noticed we no longer have trusty "pg_id".....
Wasn't needed any longer. However, with the persisting problems on
Solaris, I am tempted to take the 'id' command from FreeBSD (which seems
to be POSIX compliant) and reinstitute it as new pg_id. That would also
solve the whoami problem (the reverse if what pg_id did).
Any protests? Otherwise I'll get this fixed.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-20 11:31:26 | Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-20 11:18:11 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris |