From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE performance degradation (6.5.1) |
Date: | 1999-07-27 15:46:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.990727193953.29708L-100000@ra |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:57:36 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE performance degradation (6.5.1)
>
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> > and after vacuum analyze:
> > -rw------- 1 postgres users 8192 Jul 27 18:54 hits
> > -rw------- 1 postgres users 1703936 Jul 27 18:54 hits_pkey
> > Why hits_pkey is so big ? I have only 7 rows in the table.
>
> Looks like vacuum reclaims the extra space in the table itself,
> but does not do so with indexes. Ugh.
And do we consider this as a bug ? How do correcting of vacuum
could change poor performance ?
I just rebuild my table without using indices and performace increased
a lot. But this is undesirable because it will slowdown my application.
I'll try dbm files for logging instead of postgres. What's the shame :-)
regards,
Oleg
>
> I've thought for some time that vacuum ought to drop and rebuild
> indexes instead of trying to update them. This might be another
> reason for doing that...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-07-27 16:12:05 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] i386 RPMs available for v6.5.1 |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-07-27 15:43:35 | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |