From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2000-12-09 16:03:17 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001209190014.4174z-100000@ra |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 10:45:33 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
> Cc: vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
>
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> > btw, is there a restriction to length of key in GiST in 7.1 ?
>
> Index tuples still have to fit in a block --- no TOAST table for
> an index (yet).
not a good news. indexing and quering sets requires much more length.
is there plan to do this ?
>
> I think we can compress index datums in-line though; at least that
> should work in principle.
we could use loosy compression of GiST indices.
regards,
Oleg
>
> regards, tom lane
>
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Edmar Wiggers | 2000-12-09 16:20:17 | RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-09 15:52:05 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Edmar Wiggers | 2000-12-09 16:20:17 | RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-09 15:45:33 | Re: |