Re:

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2000-12-09 16:03:17
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001209190014.4174z-100000@ra
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 10:45:33 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
> Cc: vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
>
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> > btw, is there a restriction to length of key in GiST in 7.1 ?
>
> Index tuples still have to fit in a block --- no TOAST table for
> an index (yet).

not a good news. indexing and quering sets requires much more length.
is there plan to do this ?

>
> I think we can compress index datums in-line though; at least that
> should work in principle.

we could use loosy compression of GiST indices.

regards,

Oleg

>
> regards, tom lane
>

_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

In response to

  • Re: at 2000-12-09 15:45:33 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edmar Wiggers 2000-12-09 16:20:17 RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-09 15:52:05 Re: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c)

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edmar Wiggers 2000-12-09 16:20:17 RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-09 15:45:33 Re: