My further experiences with ecpg

From: Memphisto <szoli(at)valerie(dot)inf(dot)elte(dot)hu>
To: PostgreSQL mailinglist <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: My further experiences with ecpg
Date: 1998-10-08 14:36:01
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.3.96.981008163250.21140C-100000@valerie.inf.elte.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

I found out that I didn't have an exec sql commit at the and of the
program. With that finally psql does know about the table(pgacces still
doesn't).
A question: can this ecpg stuff be used for developing PostgreSQL
applications or shall I forget it go to use libpq?

Thanks in advance

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebestyén Zoltán AKA Memphisto It all seems so stupid,
it makes me want to give up.
szoli(at)neumann(dot)cs(dot)elte(dot)hu But why should I give up,
when it all seems so stupid?

MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft Widows

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stuart Rison 1998-10-08 15:01:12 [GENERAL] Emptying a database.
Previous Message Memphisto 1998-10-08 14:11:44 to my last letter about embedded SQL