From: | Memphisto <szoli(at)valerie(dot)inf(dot)elte(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL mailinglist <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | My further experiences with ecpg |
Date: | 1998-10-08 14:36:01 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.3.96.981008163250.21140C-100000@valerie.inf.elte.hu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I found out that I didn't have an exec sql commit at the and of the
program. With that finally psql does know about the table(pgacces still
doesn't).
A question: can this ecpg stuff be used for developing PostgreSQL
applications or shall I forget it go to use libpq?
Thanks in advance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebestyén Zoltán AKA Memphisto It all seems so stupid,
it makes me want to give up.
szoli(at)neumann(dot)cs(dot)elte(dot)hu But why should I give up,
when it all seems so stupid?
MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft Widows
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stuart Rison | 1998-10-08 15:01:12 | [GENERAL] Emptying a database. |
Previous Message | Memphisto | 1998-10-08 14:11:44 | to my last letter about embedded SQL |