Re: [SQL] rules

From: Remigiusz Sokolowski <rems(at)gdansk(dot)sprint(dot)pl>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] rules
Date: 1999-03-08 07:29:45
Message-ID: Pine.GS4.4.02A.9903080828040.11646-100000@netra.gdansk.sprint.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

>
> There seems nothing wrong with the rules, except that you
> should use OLD instead of CURRENT in the update rule too
> because CURRENT will disappear in v6.5.
>
> But from the 'UPDATE 0' I guess you're using a Postgres
> version prior to v6.4 - right? I fixed the rule system for
> v6.4, before that it was so badly broken that you should not
> even try.
>
You're right - I use ver. 6.3.2
Ufff - I feel better, when I know :-)
thanks
Rem

-------------------------------------------------------------------*------------
Remigiusz Sokolowski e-mail: rems(at)gdansk(dot)sprint(dot)pl * *
-----------------------------------------------------------------*****----------

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pierre 1999-03-08 19:27:57 6.4.x vs. 6.5 oddity
Previous Message Weon-sun Lee 1999-03-08 02:25:12 Help: insert inheritance class