Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gorm(dot)Andersen(at)Sun(dot)COM
Subject: Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm
Date: 2007-07-13 13:22:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0707130920510.27066@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Zdenek Kotala wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
>>> So pam_message ** isn't const.
>>
>> Ah, thanks. I see luna_moth is giving the same warning, so it's still
>> not const in Solaris 11 either.
>>
>> Is it worth working around this? It's strictly cosmetic AFAICS.
>>
>> The main issue in my mind would be how to determine whether to use
>> const or not. If all Solaris releases are like this, and can be
>> expected to stay that way,
>
> I think yes. It is defined as X/Open standard says.
>

Not according to the link you sent earlier. My reading says that Solaris
has it defined wrong and pg has it right.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-07-13 13:35:14 Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-07-13 13:16:16 Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm