From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gorm(dot)Andersen(at)Sun(dot)COM |
Subject: | Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm |
Date: | 2007-07-13 13:22:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0707130920510.27066@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
>>> So pam_message ** isn't const.
>>
>> Ah, thanks. I see luna_moth is giving the same warning, so it's still
>> not const in Solaris 11 either.
>>
>> Is it worth working around this? It's strictly cosmetic AFAICS.
>>
>> The main issue in my mind would be how to determine whether to use
>> const or not. If all Solaris releases are like this, and can be
>> expected to stay that way,
>
> I think yes. It is defined as X/Open standard says.
>
Not according to the link you sent earlier. My reading says that Solaris
has it defined wrong and pg has it right.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-07-13 13:35:14 | Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-07-13 13:16:16 | Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm |