From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hartmut Benz <hartmut(dot)benz(at)ti-wmc(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Small addition to PGInterval |
Date: | 2007-04-11 11:10:24 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0704110704480.1156@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Hartmut Benz wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out. I corrected the bug (months) and use the server
> definition for both year and month. It is a bit problematic to determine the
> 'correct' number of seconds in these kind of intervals because there are so
> many of them :-)
Does getLengthInMillis have any external value or is it solely useful for
implementing compareTo? I fear that people will try to do something like:
Date d = new Date();
PGInterval i = new PGInterval("1 year");
d.setTime(d.getTime() + i.getLengthInMillis());
instead of using the exising i.add(d) method. As you mention it's not
entirely clear what value it should be returning, so I'd prefer not to
expose it unless you have a more useful use case.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Xavier Poinsard | 2007-04-11 13:21:29 | Re: Prepared statement parameter and timestamp |
Previous Message | Hartmut Benz | 2007-04-11 10:52:42 | Re: Small addition to PGInterval |