From: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
Date: | 2007-02-11 00:08:33 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0702101605450.28908@resin.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I noticed in the documentation that you added indexterms for the
functions, but that they (along with the existing ones) are in the SIMILAR
TO regular expression section. These functions do not take SIMILAR TO
regular expressions, but POSIX regular expressions, so I moved them to
that section in this patch, and also moved the regexp_replace indexterm
there also, since it also uses POSIX regular expressions.
--
10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
regexp-split-matches-documented_new-7.patch | text/plain | 48.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Benjamin Arai | 2007-02-11 00:56:21 | Priorities for users or queries? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-02-10 22:25:43 | Re: XML export |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2007-02-11 15:16:04 | Re: patch for ECPG (BUG #2956: ECPG does not treat multibyte characters correctly.) |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-10 09:30:31 | Re: [PATCHES] How can I use 2GB of shared buffers on Windows? |