From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel(at)postgis(dot)refractions(dot)net>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Blasby <dblasby(at)openplans(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [postgis-devel] JDBC & WKB - 400% overhead |
Date: | 2005-02-24 10:02:34 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.56.0502240455120.17412@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Oh, I thought that binary transmit was implemented in 8.0 :-(
>
Binary transmission was done for sending bytea data, which was a big win,
but that's something we can do because we know we're sending binary data.
> As there are at least plans to use caching of prepared statements, it
> also should be possible to cache this information together with the
> prepared statement. This would reduce the number of roundtrips.
That's true, this information could be received on the first query or say
a PreparedStatement.getMetaData() call. This would definitely be a
simpler thing to do, but still 8.1 material I think.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergei Georgiev | 2005-02-24 10:04:13 | Re: Socket timeouts (probably) |
Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2005-02-24 09:39:14 | Re: [postgis-devel] JDBC & WKB - 400% overhead |