From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | roncordell(at)comcast(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XA support in JDBC driver |
Date: | 2004-09-29 13:18:50 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.56.0409290803160.14292@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 roncordell(at)comcast(dot)net wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what the status of full XA support in the JDBC driver
> is? I had read a discussion thread on The Server Side recently that
> indicated that XA was 'faked' in the pgsql jdbc driver. If anyone knows
> what this means and can share, I would greatly appreciate it.
>
The postgresql jdbc driver does not have XA support because the server
does not support distributed transactions. In the past there was a "fake"
XA implementation, but it was removed over two years ago. Basically when
calling javax.transaction.xa.XAresource#prepare() it couldn't actually do
a prepare so it only checked if there were any outstanding errors in that
transaction.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | William I. Zumwalt | 2004-09-29 16:17:15 | jdbc:postgresql:database not bound error |
Previous Message | roncordell | 2004-09-29 12:54:45 | XA support in JDBC driver |