Re: v3proto Parse/Bind and the query planner

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: v3proto Parse/Bind and the query planner
Date: 2004-05-19 00:06:08
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.56.0405181854380.21058@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> Instead, how about something like:
>
> - For named statements, plan at Parse time always.
> - For unnamed statements, plan at Bind time always.
>
> The assumption here is that if the client is using the unnamed
> statement, it's unlikely that it will be repeatedly reusing that
> statement with different parameter values so there is little benefit to
> preserving the query plan at the cost of being unable to plan for
> specific parameter values. If the client is using named statements,
> there's no change in behaviour from the current approach, so presumably
> the client knows what it's doing! :)

I was under the impression that the query protocol would Parse once and
then Bind/Execute for each execution of a statement. If that's true we
can't use the unnamed portal because it can be destroyed if a
multithreaded app is using two Statements simultaneously. The lock on
pgstream will be given up between executions of a statement.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2004-05-19 00:50:26 Re: v3proto Parse/Bind and the query planner
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2004-05-18 23:50:09 Re: v3proto Parse/Bind and the query planner