Re: Slow deletes

From: Edmund Dengler <edmundd(at)eSentire(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow deletes
Date: 2002-08-13 02:40:52
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.44.0208122238460.8305-100000@cyclops4.esentire.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks! That seems to have been the issue!

=> explain delete from syslog_event where event_id = 1000::int8;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:

Index Scan using syslog_event_event_id_idx on syslog_event
(cost=0.00..3.02 rows=1 width=6)

EXPLAIN

Deleting a single row now takes only about 5 seconds.

Regards,
Ed

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Edmund Dengler <edmundd(at)eSentire(dot)com> writes:
> > Can anyone explain why these deletes are extremely slow?
>
> > => explain delete from syslog_event where event_id = 1001;
> > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> > Seq Scan on syslog_event (cost=0.00..342277.67 rows=1 width=6)
>
> > There are over 5,000,000 rows in the table.
>
> Seqscan on a 5M-row table will take a little while...
>
> Your problem is that it's not using an indexscan, and the reason
> for that is that '1001' is taken as an integer not a bigint. The
> system is not smart about optimizing cross-datatype comparisons
> into indexscans. You could write
>
> delete from syslog_event where event_id = 1001::int8;
>
> (or use CAST if you want to be pedantically standards-compliant).
> Alternatively, consider whether event_id really needs to be bigint.
> There's a clear notational advantage in plain integer.
>
> Yes, it'd be nice if "bigintcol = 1001" acted more reasonably,
> and someday we'll make it happen ... but doing so without breaking
> the system's type-extensibility features is not trivial.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-13 02:57:02 Re: Slow deletes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-13 02:34:23 Re: Slow deletes