Re: PL/java?

From: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
To: Marshall Spight <marshall(at)meetstheeye(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/java?
Date: 2001-08-31 18:47:52
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.10.10108311446590.3934-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Marshall Spight wrote:

> This was a major issue in 1996. It's been solved for several years now, but
> the perception of Java having a speed problem remains.
>
> Java stored procedures are the #1 most-desired-by-me feature for PostgreSQL.
> Oracle and Sybase are examples of databases that have this feature already.
> (Strangely, Microsoft's database doesn't have it :-)
Its not a perception. Java is still a dog.

Again, see my mail message of few days ago regarding faking PL/java using
pl/perl ;)

-alex

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gowey, Geoffrey 2001-08-31 19:07:55 Re: speed of communication and pgsql development
Previous Message postgres 2001-08-31 18:33:40 Postmaster will not start with invalid WAL files