Re: segfault i psql

From: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
To: zilch(at)home(dot)se
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: segfault i psql
Date: 2001-06-17 18:00:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.10.10106171359380.26537-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Which version of psql is this? Since \h is a local operation, it doesn't
matter which version server is running.

'psql -V' should have it.

On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 zilch(at)home(dot)se wrote:

>
> ex=> select version();
>
> version
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> PostgreSQL 7.1.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.95.4
> (1 row)
>
> Notice the prompt difference:
>
> ex=> \hINDEX
> No help available for 'INDEX'.
> Try \h with no arguments to see available help.
> ex=> \hINDEX
> No help available for 'INDEX'.
> Try \h with no arguments to see available help.
> ex-> \hINDEX
> No help available for 'INDEX'.
> Try \h with no arguments to see available help.
> ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "s"
> ex">
>
> and sometimes it segfaults...
>
> Daniel Akerud
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Barnard 2001-06-17 18:14:45 Re: sequence, set value of
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-17 17:59:25 Re: sequence, set value of