From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | will trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OT: Apache::Session::DBI vs postgresql? --help |
Date: | 2001-06-16 23:41:21 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10106161936100.17529-100000@spider.pilosoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, will trillich wrote:
> the manpages for Apache::Session::DBI still say that it
> uses Apache::Session::DBIStore for its grunt work. whereas
You still have the old manpages (and probably old scripts).
CPAN's upgrades don't delete files that belong to old modules.
> normal db lookup scripts can
> use DBI
> which then hooks into the needed DBD::<whatever> according to
> the datasource pattern; i guess Apache::Session::DBI doesn't do
> that... which is why we have to specify
> use Apache::Session::Postgres
> *and*
> ...DataSource=>'dbi:Pg:dbname=something'...
> which seems a bit unmodular, to coin a phrase.
That's because unfortunately, the database schema that needs to be used is
dependent on the type of a database, so you do need to tell which specific
database you use.
-alex
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith F Irwin | 2001-06-17 01:04:37 | Re: Unable to --rebuild postgresql-7.1.2-4PGDG.src.rpm |
Previous Message | will trillich | 2001-06-16 23:03:39 | Re: OT: Apache::Session::DBI vs postgresql? --help |