| From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability |
| Date: | 2001-06-16 03:33:42 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10106152331010.17529-200000@spider.pilosoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is
clean...I promise, I'll get better at this.
-alex
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types.
>
> Please take a look at it.
>
> Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type
> can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected
> result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked.
>
> I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not
> commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to
> check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to
> know too.
>
> -alex
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| inet-idx.diff | text/plain | 9.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-06-16 03:44:41 | Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
| Previous Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2001-06-16 03:20:30 | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |