Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute

From: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute
Date: 2001-01-24 02:15:54
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.10.10101232115020.10091-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Just to clarify for stupid me: you want to remove it and forbid catalog
updates or remove it and allow catalog updates? (I hope its latter :)

On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > While I'm at it and before I forget the 76 places one needs to edit to
> > add/remove a system catalog column, what are people's feelings about the
> > usecatupd column?
>
> Unless someone pops up and says that they're actually using it,
> I'd agree with removing it. It seems like the sort of thing that
> might be a good idea but isn't actually getting used.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-24 03:32:52 Re: R-Tree implementation using GiST
Previous Message M Carling 2001-01-24 01:45:28 [JOB] pqsql hacker needed