Re: GNU readline and BSD license

From: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
To: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Date: 2000-12-30 02:26:23
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.10.10012292123180.30602-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 Dec 2000, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > If there is something functionally wrong with Readline then let's talk
> > about it, but let's not replace it with something because some PHP dude
> > said that RMS said something.
>
> ncftp used to be for non-commercial use only and had hooks to be
> linked against readline. RMS threatened legal action, which caused
> the developer to change the license to GPL, which was what RMS wanted.
Problem with ncftp was developers distributing binaries commercially which
were linked to libreadline.

As I said before, postgres doesn't have this problem since neither RPMs
nor other binaries do that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-12-30 03:07:59 Re: [HACKERS] About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-12-30 02:06:01 Re: GNU readline and BSD license