From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
Cc: | pggeneral <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Closest SQL dialect to PostgreSQL for ERwin? |
Date: | 2000-12-01 06:56:43 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10012010155050.5424-100000@spider.pilosoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Genealogicaley, Ingres would indeed be closest to pgsql (both are direct
descendants of University Ingres).
Probably a nicer thing would be for ERwin to have SQL-92 dialect, but
since nobody other than postgres even tried to comply to it, ERWin doesn't
support it ;)
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Ed Loehr wrote:
> I'm using ERwin to reverse engineer an ER diagram from PostgreSQL SQL
> scripts (via pg_dump). ERwin does not officially support PostgreSQL's
> flavor of SQL, though having it read PostgreSQL scripts as Ingres scripts
> seems to work ok.
>
> Is there another well-known RDBMS vendor (Informix?) whose dialect and
> SQL idiosyncrasies (sp?) are closer to PostgreSQL's SQL than Ingres?
> ERwin supports most of the big RDBMS names (Pg is the only one I noticed
> missing), and I don't know much about the various dialect differences.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Loehr
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gordan Bobic | 2000-12-01 08:58:58 | Re: Database cluster? |
Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2000-12-01 05:50:49 | strange error (32 512) |