From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Mr(dot) Shannon Aldinger" <god(at)yinyang(dot)hjsoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
Date: | 2000-12-01 00:12:35 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10011301910540.28752-100000@spider.pilosoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Mr. Shannon Aldinger wrote:
> Linux kernel 2.2.x unpatched has the 2GB file size and 1GB ram limit.
> Patched with the lfs package the 2GB file size limit goes away.
> The lfs patch needs applied against gnu-libc as well. This alone may not
> avoid the 2GB limit, the application must use the lseek64 instead of
> lseek, for example. lfs will be included by default in the upcoming 2.4.x
That's automatic, if you compile your source with -D_LARGE_FILES (or
something like that, don't remember exact names).
> kernels. The upcoming 2.4.x kernels also support more ram. I'm fairly
> certain ram patches exist for the 2.2.x series.
>
> I have just one question to ask will postgresql 7.1 include full support
> for using lseek64, stat64, etc?
Postgres doesn't need to. Just autoconf script needs to have an option
--with-large-files argument that would add -D_LARGE_FILES to CFLAGS.
-alex
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Ellis | 2000-12-01 00:50:47 | pltcl: missing close-brace |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2000-11-30 23:35:41 | Re: inheritance and foreign keys |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Ellis | 2000-12-01 00:50:47 | pltcl: missing close-brace |
Previous Message | musicon | 2000-12-01 00:10:35 | eject |