| From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| Date: | 2000-10-13 02:25:34 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10010122224030.19791-100000@spider.pilosoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 13 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> writes:
>
> > May bad... sometimes it is too easy assuming everything open source is GPL.
> >
>
> > > > correct?, so it can't really be proprietised unless they make an add-on
>
> Of course both lincenses can be the basis of propriatery efforts(GPL and
> Apache(BSD style licenses). My company used to prefere investing in GPL SW
> because of the lack of the adv. clause.
This is sort of a red herring. BSD style is just that, BSD style. _most_
BSD-style licenses (and _the_ BSD license of Regents of UC) removed the
'obnoxious advertising' clause.
There are other reasons to prefer BSD-style over GPL, but this isn't one.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-13 03:02:05 | FreeBSD core team history |
| Previous Message | Gunnar R|nning | 2000-10-13 01:49:33 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |