| From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Anyone using ReiserFS in production work? (or advise against it?) |
| Date: | 2000-07-05 23:06:58 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10007051905370.10860-100000@spider.pilosoft.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 felix(at)crowfix(dot)com wrote:
> "Randall Parker" <randall(at)nls(dot)net> writes:
>
> > The title says it all: Is this a foolhardy or prudent and wise move
> > at this time?
> >
> > Has anyone run Postgres databases on ReiserFS volumes under heavy
> > enough load and for long enough to get a sense of how stable it is?
Not very heavy load, but for long enough time.
> > Anyone tried pulling the power plug under heavy load to find out if
> > ReiserFS is less prone to volume corruption than ext2 under these
> > circumstances?
Less. I never had "bad" corruption with reiser. On other hand, I never had
'bad' corruption with ext2 either. ;) But theoretically, its possible with
ext2 and avoidable with reiser.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?= | 2000-07-05 23:28:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable? |
| Previous Message | Richard Nfor | 2000-07-05 23:06:28 | pl/pgsql function out parameters |