Re: Re: Anyone using ReiserFS in production work? (or advise against it?)

From: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Anyone using ReiserFS in production work? (or advise against it?)
Date: 2000-07-05 23:06:58
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.10.10007051905370.10860-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 felix(at)crowfix(dot)com wrote:

> "Randall Parker" <randall(at)nls(dot)net> writes:
>
> > The title says it all: Is this a foolhardy or prudent and wise move
> > at this time?
> >
> > Has anyone run Postgres databases on ReiserFS volumes under heavy
> > enough load and for long enough to get a sense of how stable it is?
Not very heavy load, but for long enough time.

> > Anyone tried pulling the power plug under heavy load to find out if
> > ReiserFS is less prone to volume corruption than ext2 under these
> > circumstances?
Less. I never had "bad" corruption with reiser. On other hand, I never had
'bad' corruption with ext2 either. ;) But theoretically, its possible with
ext2 and avoidable with reiser.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?= 2000-07-05 23:28:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable?
Previous Message Richard Nfor 2000-07-05 23:06:28 pl/pgsql function out parameters