| From: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CORBA / libpq |
| Date: | 2000-06-01 17:03:57 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.10.10006011302270.13270-100000@spider.pilosoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sounds like you are doing something seriously wrong. (Such as connecting
to a wrong machine or a wrong port, confusing hell out of libpq).
libpq opens a new tcp connection to server, and it is impossible for it to
pick up corba traffic....
-alex
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Adriaan Joubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody used libpq from a CORBA server? I've got a server
> (omniORB3) and try to write data to the database from the server. libpq
> seems to receive incorrect messages from the backend ("Backend message
> type 0x50 arrived while idle"). As this is intermittent I'm wondering
> whether libpq is picking up messages intended for the CORBA server
> rather than for itself.
>
> Has anybody else done this before and knows whether this works or not?
> There isn't an alternative to using libpq, is there?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adriaan
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-01 17:18:29 | Re: 2700-byte prosrc limit fixed? |
| Previous Message | Ed Loehr | 2000-06-01 16:54:28 | 2700-byte prosrc limit fixed? |