Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com>
To: Brian <signal(at)shreve(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Date: 1999-05-13 20:07:04
Message-ID: Pine.BSI.3.91.990513160539.12249G-100000@access1.lan2wan.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 13 May 1999, Brian wrote:

> > I am assuming here, of course, that this didn't change betwen 6.3 and 6.4
> > (which is what I am using).
>
> ok, so then I am assuming:
>
> /usr/bin/postmaster -B 256 -i -S -D/var/lib/pgsql -o -F -S 1024
>
> is what I would want...............

Yep. You can also put the -B as a backend option, but under postmaster,
it still does the shared buffer allocation.

Brett W. McCoy
http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"When are you BUTTHEADS gonna learn that you can't oppose Gestapo
tactics *with* Gestapo tactics?"
-- Reuben Flagg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett W. McCoy 1999-05-13 21:28:17 Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Previous Message Dustin Sallings 1999-05-13 19:51:26 Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??