Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??

From: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com>
To: Brian <signal(at)shreve(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Date: 1999-05-13 19:00:51
Message-ID: Pine.BSI.3.91.990513144044.12249E-100000@access1.lan2wan.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 13 May 1999, Brian wrote:

> Would something like this be appropriate?
>
> /usr/bin/postmaster -B 256 -i -S -D/var/lib/pgsql -o -F -B 256 -S 1024
>
> or should -B just be in their once? in the postmaster setting?

Just once. If you pass it back to a backend from the postmaster, the
postmaster handles the allocation as shared memory buffers. Here's what
the man page for postgres says:

-B n_buffers
If the backend is running under the postmaster,
n_buffers is the number of shared-memory buffers
that the postmaster has allocated for the backend
server processes that it starts. If the backend is
running standalone, this specifies the number of
buffers to allocate. This value defaults to 64,
and each buffer is 8k bytes.

I am assuming here, of course, that this didn't change betwen 6.3 and 6.4
(which is what I am using).

Brett W. McCoy
http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"A raccoon tangled with a 23,000 volt line today. The results blacked
out 1400 homes and, of course, one raccoon."
-- Steel City News

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dustin Sallings 1999-05-13 19:43:26 Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Previous Message Brett W. McCoy 1999-05-13 18:40:37 Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??