| From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "aturner(at)neteconomist(dot)com" <aturner(at)neteconomist(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrade Woes |
| Date: | 2003-09-11 15:54:55 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.44.0309111153590.71984-100000@torgo.978.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, aturner(at)neteconomist(dot)com wrote:
>
> The Vacuum full is performed once at the end of the whole job.
>
have you also tried vacuum analyze periodically - it does not lock the
table and can help quite a bit?
still odd why it would be that much slower between those versions.
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-09-11 15:55:47 | Re: [GENERAL] how to get accurate values in pg_statistic |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-11 15:47:32 | Re: Upgrade Woes |