| From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance Tuning |
| Date: | 2003-08-14 12:33:12 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.44.0308140830090.21661-100000@torgo.978.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think Informix's track record for post-Informix 5.0 releases is poor:
>
> 6.0 aborted release, pretty much withdrawn
> 7.0 took 1-2 years to stabalize
> 8.0 where was that?
8.0 never occured. It went 7.3 -> 9.0
> 9.0 confused customers
9.0 had some good stuff. 9.4 *FINALLY* removed a lot of limitations (2GB
chunks, etc). (9.4 came out a few years after 7)
> How much does Informix improve in 6 months? In 2 years? How long does
> it take to get a bug fixed?
You make me laugh :)
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff | 2003-08-14 12:35:17 | Re: Perfomance Tuning |
| Previous Message | Jeff | 2003-08-14 12:30:02 | Re: Perfomance Tuning |