Re: Win32 Powerfail testing - results

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 Powerfail testing - results
Date: 2003-02-03 17:20:13
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0302031218330.21301-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Dave Page wrote:

> Well the results are finally in. Hopefully we can concentrate on putting
> them right, rather than having a round of "told you so's" :-)
>
> I modified the test program slightly to improve the consistency checks.
> The updated version is attached.

[...]

>
> Run | Errors Detected
> =============================================================
> 07 | COUNT CHECK - Duplicate or missing rows detected (10262)!!
> 09 | DISTINCT CHECK - Duplicate or missing rows detected (9893)!!
> | COUNT CHECK - Duplicate or missing rows detected (9893)!!
> 14 | COUNT CHECK - Duplicate or missing rows detected (10024)!!

Out of curiousity, what was required to return things to normal
again?

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wade 2003-02-03 17:32:20 Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-02-03 17:07:48 Re: PGP signing releases