Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Katie Ward <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curtis Faith <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-01-29 16:44:49
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0301291142310.47421-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:

> > hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength
> > solution".
>
> Have you a better suggestion? Seems a bit catch 22 if testing won't
> prove it's good and we can't use it until we know it's good... Still,
> industrial strength testing or not, it's more reliable than the SQL 2000
> and DB2 installations I have here.

Well you have a beta running, load it up with data and let a few hundred
clients loose on it. I've seen win2k BSOD with less stress than that.

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-29 16:45:32 Re: Specifying Rowtypes
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-01-29 16:40:24 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System