failure notice (fwd)

Who the hell are these people and why can't they configure their
own MTA?

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
==========================================================================

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 15 Aug 2002 16:47:22 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON(at)ic(dot)kharkov(dot)ua
To: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ic.kharkov.ua.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
Connected to 192.204.191.242 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550 5.0.0 Go away, your mailserver is broken

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Received: (qmail 62268 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 16:46:47 -0000
Received: from dialup44.kharkov.ukrpack.net (HELO dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua) (212.1.112.156)
by mail.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 16:46:47 -0000
Received: from dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua (DUAL [172.16.200.1]) by dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0)
id Q926YA3A; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:46:07 +0300
Received: by dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua (Microsoft Exchange Connector for POP3 Mailboxes 4.50.2113) with SMTP (Global POP3 Download)
id MSG08152002-194556-214(dot)MMD(at)shena(dot)ic(dot)kharkov(dot)ua; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:45:56 +0300
Return-Path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M26848(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Delivered-To: pop-users-shena(at)ic(dot)kharkov(dot)ua
Received: (qmail 61671 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000
Delivered-To: shena-shevtchenko(at)shena(dot)ic(dot)kharkov(dot)ua
Received: (qmail 61668 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000
Received: from postgresql.org (64.49.215.8)
by mail.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000
Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 419EF47654E; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id A2668475F2D; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE137475974
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (adsl-67-36-71-182.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [67.36.71.182])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCB8947594D
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 55151 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Aug 2002 16:38:45 -0000
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items
In-Reply-To: <200208151616(dot)g7FGGW500908(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Message-ID: <Pine(dot)BSF(dot)4(dot)40(dot)0208151235180(dot)52449-100000(at)paprika(dot)michvhf(dot)com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > OK, no one complained/commented on my idea of having global users have a
> > > trailing '@', so here is a patch that implements that. It has the
> > > advantages of:
> >
> > Probably because not everyone saw it. I know I didn't. This entire
> > issue is growing more and more complex. How about a configure item
> > to not even compile it in? Or better yet, a configure item to put
> > it there with the default off.
>
> I think I am prety close, and I don't see a configure flag as any better
> than a GUC option that is off by default.

But how many people would even use it? I can't see adding the bloat
unnecessarily and risking it accidently being turned on. Am I wrong
and really alot of people actually want/need this?

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
==========================================================================

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org