From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
Cc: | "'Darren Johnson'" <djohnson(at)greatbridge(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AW: Postgres Replication |
Date: | 2001-06-12 09:07:41 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.33.0106120605130.411-100000@mobile.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
which I believe is what the rserv implementation in contrib currently does
... no?
its funny ... what is in contrib right now was developed in a weekend by
Vadim, put in contrib, yet nobody has either used it *or* seen fit to
submit patches to improve it ... ?
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> > Although
> > Postgres-R is a synchronous approach, I believe it is the closest to
> > the goal mentioned above. Here is an abstract of the advantages.
>
> If you only want synchronous replication, why not simply use triggers ?
> All you would then need is remote query access and two phase commit,
> and maybe a little script that helps create the appropriate triggers.
>
> Doing a replicate all or nothing approach that only works synchronous
> is imho not flexible enough.
>
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bob Deblier | 2001-06-12 12:35:43 | Re: dlopen() of libpgsqlodbc.so >= release 7.1 fails on sparc solaris 2.8 |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2001-06-12 07:35:03 | AW: Implicit order-by in Postgresql? |