Re: [HACKERS] Re: three VERY minor things with 7.1 final

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David George <david(at)onyxsoft(dot)com>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: three VERY minor things with 7.1 final
Date: 2001-04-18 00:28:51
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.33.0104172127020.11774-100000@mobile.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> David George <david(at)onyxsoft(dot)com> writes:
> > I just built the postgresql 7.1 final and the configure script is still
> > checking for sfio. Not a major big deal, but I need to remove the sfio
> > check from configure.in, run autoconf, and then configure to fix it. If
> > you remember sfio on Sparc Solaris 7 was causing a segfault when psql
> > would display its output.
>
> Hmm. Digging in the CVS logs and pghackers archives, it seems that
> configure started checking for sfio in response to Michael Richards'
> unsubstantiated claim that FreeBSD 2.2.5 requires it to be used
> (http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-hackers/1998-04/msg00363.html)
> Can anyone confirm or deny that? Marc had previously expressed some
> interest as well (thread starting at
> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-hackers/1998-04/msg00219.html)
> but the outcome of that thread didn't seem to suggest that it's a
> must-have item.

Damn, now *that* is an old thread ... I can't see any reason why it would
be required for FreeBSD, as its only a port for the OS, not part of it ...

> I'm tempted to rip out the configure check for sfio, but if it's only
> broken on some systems and really is useful on others, then we have to
> try to figure out how to tell if it's broken :-(

Pull it, as far as I'm conerned ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-04-18 04:23:31 Re: Postgres Installation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-04-18 00:01:45 Re: What's wrong with glibc-devel-2.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lance Taylor 2001-04-18 00:34:33 Re: Re: timeout on lock feature
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-04-18 00:13:47 Re: Re: timeout on lock feature