| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: RC3 ... |
| Date: | 2001-04-07 00:01:30 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.33.0104062101030.81918-100000@mobile.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >
> > > > > The docs are ready for shipment.
> > > > Even better ...
> > > > Okay, let's let this sit as RC3 for the next week...
> > >
> > > I'll go ahead and start generating hardcopy, though I understand that it
> > > is no longer allowed into the shipping tarball :(
> >
> > At 2Meg, is there a reason why we include any of the docs as part of the
> > standard tar ball? It shouldn't be required to compile, so should be able
> > to be left out of the main tar ball and downloaded seperately as required
> > .. thereby shrinking the distribution to <6Meg from its current 8 ...
>
> Can we drop TODO.detail from the tarball too? No need to include that,
> I think. The web site has nice links to it now. Uncompressed it is
> 1.314 megs.
Definitely, I think TODO.detail should be refer'd to by the TODO file, but
not included in the distribution itself ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-07 00:09:05 | Re: Re: RC3 ... |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-04-06 23:52:38 | Re: Re: RC3 ... |