From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgindent run? |
Date: | 2001-03-22 04:48:09 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.33.0103220047050.48022-100000@mobile.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Hey, I am open to whatever people want to do. Just remember that we
> > > accumulate lots of patches/development during the slow time before
> > > development, and those patches become harder to apply. Peter E has some
> > > already.
> >
> > Why not start a devel cycle by (a) branching the tree, (b) applying
> > all held-over patches, and then (c) running pgindent?
>
> If people can get their patches in all at one time, that would work.
> The only problem there is that people who supply patches against 7.1
> will not match the 7.2 tree, and we get those patches from people for
> months.
and those patches should only be applied to the v7.1 branch ... we are
suggesting (or, at least, I am) is that you pgindent *HEAD* after we've
branched off v7.1 ...
... that way, we go into the new dev cycle "clean", but we doon't mess up
the *STABLE* tree ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 04:50:46 | Re: pgindent run? |
Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-03-22 04:47:52 | Re: More on elog and error codes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 04:50:46 | Re: pgindent run? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 04:45:17 | Re: pgindent run? |