From: | Francisco Reyes <fran(at)reyes(dot)somos(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | rudy <rudy(at)heymax(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: explain plan |
Date: | 2001-02-02 05:13:39 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.32.0102020007560.1877-100000@zoraida.reyes.somos.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
> Seq Scan on article (cost=0.00..1.61 rows=1 width=8)
:-)
Replying to myself..
Notice the "cost" reported by the database. "0.00..1.61". That is fairly
low. Just to give you an example. I have a table with 259 rows. and I got:
-------
test=# explain select * from phones;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on phones (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=36)
EXPLAIN
test=# vacuum analyze
test-# ;
VACUUM
test=# explain select * from phones;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on phones (cost=0.00..5.59 rows=259 width=36)
--------
0 to 5.59 for just 259 rows, yet yours is only 1.61. Possible the entire
table was in memory so there was no need to go to index.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2001-02-02 05:23:12 | Re: how to deteck empty tables in outer joins |
Previous Message | Francisco Reyes | 2001-02-02 05:07:24 | Re: explain plan |