Re: avg() bug?

From: Patrik Kudo <kudo(at)partitur(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: avg() bug?
Date: 2001-03-05 17:51:48
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0103051843510.976-100000@tb303.partitur.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks Tom!

I'll use sum(a::int4) until 7.1 then.

Regards,
Patrik Kudo

ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
Känns det oklart? Fråga på!

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Patrik Kudo <kudo(at)partitur(dot)se> writes:
> > I suppose avg() does a sum()/count() where sum returns a int2,
> > which will be too small to contain the sum if the table contains
> > many values?
>
> Yes. This is changed in 7.1 --- sum() and avg() of int values now
> return type 'numeric'.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuel Sieb 2001-03-05 18:19:11 Re: Re: With which user Apache accesses PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-05 17:37:38 Re: avg() bug?