| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol |
| Date: | 2001-02-12 01:30:04 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.31.0102112129190.54632-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > > I can put it back. You want it back?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > > ISTM discussion is needed before the change.
> > >
> > > I'm with Bruce on this (sorry Hiroshi :-)):
> > >
> > > 1) Surely if anyone is still using 6.3 or 6.2 they will probably not be
> > > wanting to keep their ODBC driver cutting edge whilst using such an old
> > > backend.
> >
> > I think Hiroshi's complaint was that it should be discussed more.
> > Seems we have discussed it, and most agree on the removal.
> >
>
> Hmm I think you are not walking a proper 'discussion first'
> process in the first place. You committed the removal 7 hours
> after you had posted the first mail of this thread.
> Is it sufficient ?
Nope, a *discussion* should go for *at least* 24 hrs after the first post
in the discussion ... then again, similar rules should apply before
applying any patches in the first place ... *roll eyes*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-12 01:55:59 | Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-02-12 01:07:02 | Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol |