Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL <petere(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
Date: 2001-01-14 03:56:51
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0101132355090.500-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> Eh? Table, row, column *are* the SQL terminology. The others are
> >> leftovers from PostQuel, and it's been a long time since we've used
> >> them consistently anyway.
>
> > Okay, then its definitely me confused here ... "The Practical SQL
> > Handbook", which I don' thave in front of me ... it doesn't refer to
> > things as table/row/column ... does it?
>
> I dunno about that book, but I do have the SQL spec in front of me,
> and class/instance/attribute are not used in it. Table/row/column
> are.

Can't ask more definitive then that ... thanks for clarifying and
confiming ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-14 05:08:17 pgsql/src backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c ba ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-14 03:55:42 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...