From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL <petere(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |
Date: | 2001-01-14 03:40:15 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.31.0101132338490.500-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>>> Log message:
> >>>> Terminology cleanup: class -> table, instance -> row, attribute -> column,
> >>>> etc.
> >>
> >> Yeeh.
>
> > sad, actually ... we try to be SQL complaint, yet we can't handle the
> > terminology? :(
>
> Eh? Table, row, column *are* the SQL terminology. The others are
> leftovers from PostQuel, and it's been a long time since we've used
> them consistently anyway.
Okay, then its definitely me confused here ... "The Practical SQL
Handbook", which I don' thave in front of me ... it doesn't refer to
things as table/row/column ... does it?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-14 03:43:26 | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-14 03:36:55 | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |