Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Date: 2001-01-11 23:21:53
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0101111919540.21628-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> >
> > just downloaded it and can't find any regression tests ... ?
>
> it's in the contrib-intarray.tar.gz
> gmake, gmake install, gmake installcheck

erk, can we get this somehow done in such a way that its part of the
*standard* regression tests? so when ppl do 'make test', the GiST stuff
is checked also? My worry, as with others, isn't that GiST itself is
broken by the changes, its that *somehow* there is an interaction that is
with the rest of the system that isn't being tested ...

>
>
> Oleg
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> > > > > > I understand Tom's arguments and respect his experience, so I think it's
> > > > > > possible to put link to my page in 7.1 docs for people interested in
> > > > > > GiST features.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bear in mind that I only have one core vote ;-). We've already had some
> > > > > private core discussion about whether to accept this patch now, and so
> > > > > far I think I'm outvoted.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are several Tom Lane, judge by your activity. You probably need
> > > > several votes.
> > > >
> > > > > Did I understand you to say that you'd added some regression tests for
> > > > > GiST? That would lessen my unhappiness a little bit ...
> > > >
> > > > Yes, we did. Currently all files are available from my page
> > > > http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/
> > > > I could submit them to hackers list if CORE people got consensus
> > >
> > > Okay, if there are appropriate regression tests, I'm going to say go for
> > > it ...
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any objections to my downloading the tar file (doing that
> > > now), committing the changes and wrapping up a quick Beta4 just so that we
> > > have a tar ball that is testable right away?
> > >
> > > Save Lamar and the other packagers a bit of work by avoiding beta3
> > > packages :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> > Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> > primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
> >
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
>
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-11 23:23:25 Re: PostgreSQL v7.1BETA3 Bundled and Available ...
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-11 23:20:34 Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options