Re: GNU readline and BSD license

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Date: 2000-12-30 00:39:57
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0012292036110.50868-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


thelab# du -sk libedit
402 libedit
thelab# ls
Makefile el.h map.c refresh.h tokenizer.c
TEST emacs.c map.h search.c tokenizer.h
chared.c hist.c parse.c search.h tty.c
chared.h hist.h parse.h sig.c tty.h
common.c history.c prompt.c sig.h vi.c
editline.3 key.c prompt.h sys.h
editrc.5 key.h read.c term.c
el.c makelist refresh.c term.h

its tiny ...

we'd be adding a whole 79k to the 6meg distribution:

> ls -lt /tmp/libedit.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 scrappy wheel 79025 Dec 29 20:38 /tmp/libedit.tar.gz

and providing all the functionality that ppl who don't have libreadline
already installed don't get ...

On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > Actually, IMHO, the pro to moving to libedit is that we could include it
> > as part of the distribution and make history a *standard* feature
>
> How big is libedit? If it's tiny, that might be a good argument ...
> but I don't want to see us bulking up our distro with something that
> people could and should get directly from its source.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-12-30 00:41:14 Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-30 00:29:55 Re: NULLS and <> : Discrepancies ?