From: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: locked up backends |
Date: | 2001-04-06 01:47:10 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.30.0104052120160.55546-100000@paprika.michvhf.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Randall F. Kern" <randy(at)spoke(dot)net> writes:
> > I see this pretty often on 7.1b4, running on redhat linux 6.2 (or 7.0;
> > same problem on both). My lockups are always either INSERT or UPDATE,
> > and all the other backends are shown as "idle in transaction".
>
> Oh? 7.1 doesn't have the problem I was thinking of, so you may have a
> different issue. Could you attach to the stuck backends with gdb and
> get a backtrace from each one, so we can see approximately what they're
> doing? (It'd help if you've compiled with debug symbols.)
How 'bout this version?
PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on i386-unknown-freebsdelf3.2, compiled by gcc 2.7.2.1
I was away all day and came back to a logcheck message about running
out of swap and a process being killed. ps -axww showed a number of
these:
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres nobody 127.0.0.1 twig idle
twig's a web based pim. I also noticed a bunch of messages that told
me there were some messages that imapd had trouble with. ISTM that
these should've been killed off by something before the OS did it. I
killed them off (9 of them) by HUPping httpd. Is this closer to what
you were thinking?
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-06 02:23:15 | Re: locked up backends |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-06 01:03:22 | Re: locked up backends |