Re: [GENERAL] Mailing Lists

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff MacDonald <jeff(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Mailing Lists
Date: 1999-12-15 01:57:33
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.9912142156440.57039-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Ed Loehr wrote:

> Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
> > The lists are taking up >50% of the cd. I'm curious about people's
> > opinions. The archives are a valuable resource. But out of those
> > who have ever bought a cd, or those that would,
> >
> > Would you use the archives off the cd ?
> >
> > Consider the point, that these archives are possibly outdated when
> > you receive the cd, and that the Live archives on www.postgresql.org
> > are searchable.
>
> CD archives would seem replaceable to me if the www.postgresql.org search
> engine were a bit more reliable and useful (ie easier to navigate threads
> found via search.

Okay, I'm confused...when ht/dig worked, if you clicked on a mesage you
wanted to read, that message had a 'thread' link that would list all
messages in that thread...

...or are you talking about something different?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 1999-12-15 03:51:52 Postgres instability : AN APPEAL
Previous Message Ed Loehr 1999-12-15 00:57:32 Re: [GENERAL] Mailing Lists